0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡·á È¿°ú °¨ÁöÁ¤µµ¿Í ½ÅüÀû °íÅë °¨ÁöÁ¤µµ°¡ ¼ö¼úÁ÷ÈÄ ¾ÏȯÀÚÀÇ Èñ¸Á¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Influences of Perceived Treatment Effect and Perceived Physical Suffering on Hope of Cancer Patients in Post-operative Period

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2003³â 15±Ç 1È£ p.78 ~ 87
KMID : 0367020030150010078
¾È¼ºÀ± ( Ahn Sung-Yoon ) - Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú

±è´Þ¼÷ ( Kim Dal-Sook ) - Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of the study were 1) to examine what relationships exist between PTE(perceived treatments effect) and PPS(perceived physical suffering) as the independent variables and hope as the dependent variable and 2) to examine whether PTE and PPS predict hope in cancer patients in their post-operative period within the Stotland¡¯s hope theory.

Method: The Visual Analog Scale was used for measuring PTE and PPS and the Kim & Lee¡¯s Hope Scale which had acceptable reliability and validity was used for measuring hope. The data was collected from 38 hospitalized cancer patients who were in the post-operative period with a convenient sampling method.

Result: There was a significant positive relationship between hope and the PTE in the low PTE group. There was a significant negative relationship between hope and the PPS in the low PPS group. There were no significant relationships between hope and the PTE in the high PTE group, and between hope and the PPS in the high PPS group. And the PTE explained hope with 71.2% of the variance in the low PTE group.

Conclusion: PTE in the low PTE group and PPS in the low PPS group were identified as the factors to explain hope.
KeyWords

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed